merits of Lisp vs Python
Andrew Reilly
andrew-newspost at areilly.bpc-users.org
Thu Dec 14 03:45:00 EST 2006
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:01:46 -0500, Ken Tilton wrote:
> You just
> aren't used to thinking at a level where one is writing code to write code.
Firstly, I'm looking into lisp because my current python project is too
full of boilerplate :-) and too slow. Coming from a C and assembler
background, I'm *used* to meta-programming, and do it all the time. I
even use python, Matlab and bash to write C, sometimes :-)
However, in this particular instance, I'm inclined to wonder why
meta-programming is the right answer, rather than just doing all of the
interpolation and what-not at run-time, based on a big table of your
algebra rules? It's for output to a human, isn't it? It's not as though
it needs to be particularly fast?
Maybe I'm just not digging the example sufficiently. That's likely: I've
yet to write my first lisp program...
Cheers,
--
Andrew
More information about the Python-list
mailing list