New Python.org website ?

[Tim Parkin]

Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Shalabh Chaturvedi wrote:
> 
> 
>>Hm. Am I the only one not particularly impressed?
> 
> 
> no.
> 
> the design is alright (if a bit too "bland business"), but the little I've seen of the
> information architecture and the backend infrastructure feels like 1998 (which,
> I suppose, was when the project started...)

Could you expand on why the backend infrastructure and information
architecture feel like 1998? (it's a bit of an abstract comment and
doesn't offer anything constructive).

An example of a site info architecture that feels like 2005 would be
good. Also an example of a backend architecture that isn't like 1998
would be good too.

Tim Parkin