another docs problem - imp
Christoph Zwerschke
cito at online.de
Sun Jan 22 21:02:43 EST 2006
I assume one cause of the misunderstanding was the name "path" for the
search path. If it had been named "paths" it would have been more
obvious. But Python is only following a common standard here. Since
environment variables are called PATH, CLASSPATH etc. it was only
logical to use PYTHONPATH and sys.path etc. Therefore the imp module
uses "pathname" where it is only a single path.
Probably the people who once invented the env variables didn't care
about writing PATHS because it sounds like PATH anyway (or is there a
difference? I am German).
Anyway, the docs are technically correct. Maybe the best solution would
not to improve the docs but to allow path to be a string in which case
it would be treated as [string].
-- Christoph
More information about the Python-list
mailing list