Using non-ascii symbols
Steven D'Aprano
steve at REMOVETHIScyber.com.au
Tue Jan 24 17:15:29 EST 2006
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:58:35 -0600, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:26:16 +1100 in comp.lang.python, Steven
> D'Aprano <steve at REMOVETHIScyber.com.au> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:38:56 -0600, Dave Hansen wrote:
>>
>>> The latter, IMHO. Especially variable names. Consider i vs. ì vs. í
>>> vs. î vs. ï vs. ...
>>
>>Agreed, but that's the programmer's fault for choosing stupid variable
>>names. (One character names are almost always a bad idea. Names which can
>>be easily misread are always a bad idea.) Consider how easy it is to
>
> I wasn't necessarily expecting single-character names. Indeed, the
> different between i and ì is easier to see than the difference
> between, say, long_variable_name and long_varìable_name. For me,
> anyway.
Sure. But that's no worse than pxfoobrtnamer and pxfoobtrnamer.
I'm not saying that adding more characters to the mix won't increase the
opportunity to pick bad names. But this isn't a new problem, it is an old
problem.
>>shoot yourself in the foot with plain ASCII:
>>
>>
>>l1 = 0
>>l2 = 4
>>...
>>pages of code
>>...
>>assert 11 + l2 = 4
>
> You've shot yourself twice, there.
Deliberately so. The question is, in real code without the assert, should
the result of the addition be 4, 12, 15 or 23?
--
Steven.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list