Using non-ascii symbols

Steven D'Aprano steve at REMOVETHIScyber.com.au
Tue Jan 24 23:15:29 CET 2006


On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:58:35 -0600, Dave Hansen wrote:

> On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:26:16 +1100 in comp.lang.python, Steven
> D'Aprano <steve at REMOVETHIScyber.com.au> wrote:
> 
>>On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:38:56 -0600, Dave Hansen wrote:
>>
>>> The latter, IMHO.  Especially variable names.  Consider i vs. ì vs. í
>>> vs. î vs. ï vs. ...
>>
>>Agreed, but that's the programmer's fault for choosing stupid variable
>>names. (One character names are almost always a bad idea. Names which can
>>be easily misread are always a bad idea.) Consider how easy it is to
> 
> I wasn't necessarily expecting single-character names.  Indeed, the
> different between i and ì is easier to see than the difference
> between, say, long_variable_name and long_varìable_name.  For me,
> anyway.

Sure. But that's no worse than pxfoobrtnamer and pxfoobtrnamer.

I'm not saying that adding more characters to the mix won't increase the
opportunity to pick bad names. But this isn't a new problem, it is an old
problem.


 
>>shoot yourself in the foot with plain ASCII:
>>
>>
>>l1 = 0
>>l2 = 4
>>...
>>pages of code
>>...
>>assert 11 + l2 = 4
> 
> You've shot yourself twice, there.

Deliberately so. The question is, in real code without the assert, should
the result of the addition be 4, 12, 15 or 23?



-- 
Steven.




More information about the Python-list mailing list