Wed Jan 18 21:24:28 CET 2006
skip at pobox.com writes:
> Even your technique narrows the list of candidates down to one, that
> doesn't solve the problem. There is a certain "stamp of approval"
> implicit with inclusion in the standard library. It's thus a fairly
> important decision to get at least approximately right.
Yes, but something completely unsuitable shouldn't be on the list in
the first place. The main point is there aren't a million packages to
worry about, there are a handful, and that can probably be quickly
narrowed down to even fewer. Once that's done, the remaining
candidates can be considered in more depth.
More information about the Python-list