Initializing an attribute that needs the object
fairwinds at eastlink.ca
Fri Jun 2 23:47:43 CEST 2006
My apologies. What I meant to write was this
def __init__(self, handler):
David Pratt wrote:
> Hi Marco. Thanks for your reply. I am providing the handler with the
> factory instance as I have shown. This is how my code currently works.
> What I am trying to figure out is how to possibly provide the handler in
> the constructor when it needs the factory instance. This would give me
> some better flexibility.
> class Factory
> def __init__(self, factory):
> At this point I don't have self. Would super help me?
> Marco Giusti wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 06:15:28PM -0300, David Pratt wrote:
>>> Hi. I want to have different handlers to do perform logic. The problem
>>> is the Handler requires an instance of the factory since it will use its
>>> own methods in conjunction with methods of the factory.
>>> Once I have got a Factory instance I can give it a new handler (see
>>> below). It would be more flexible if I could provide a handle in
>>> constructor - but how to do this when it requires the object itself.
>>> Would I use a super for this sort of thing? Many thanks
>> when __init__ is called the object already exists.
>>> class Factory:
>>> def __init__(self):
>>> self.some_handler = Handler(self)
>>> f = Factory()
>>> f.some_handler = AnotherHandler(f)
>> try this, should works:
>> class Factory:
>> def __init__(self):
>> self._some_handler = AnotherHandler(self)
>> maybe a class hierarchy is good for you
More information about the Python-list