Saying "latently-typed language" is making a category mistake

Jürgen Exner jurgenex at hotmail.com
Fri Jun 23 15:50:50 CEST 2006


Vesa Karvonen wrote:
> In comp.lang.functional Anton van Straaten <anton at appsolutions.com>
> wrote: [...]
>> I reject this comparison.  There's much more to it than that.  The
>
> I think that we're finally getting to the bottom of things.  While
> reading your reponses something became very clear to me:
> latent-typing and latent- types are not a property of languages.
> Latent-typing, also known as informal reasoning, is something that

And what does this have to do with Perl? Are you an alter ego of Xha Lee who 
spills his 'wisdom' across any newsgroup he can find?

jue 





More information about the Python-list mailing list