Initializing an attribute that needs the object
fairwinds at eastlink.ca
Fri Jun 2 23:45:24 CEST 2006
Hi Marco. Thanks for your reply. I am providing the handler with the
factory instance as I have shown. This is how my code currently works.
What I am trying to figure out is how to possibly provide the handler in
the constructor when it needs the factory instance. This would give me
some better flexibility.
def __init__(self, factory):
At this point I don't have self. Would super help me?
Marco Giusti wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 06:15:28PM -0300, David Pratt wrote:
>> Hi. I want to have different handlers to do perform logic. The problem
>> is the Handler requires an instance of the factory since it will use its
>> own methods in conjunction with methods of the factory.
>> Once I have got a Factory instance I can give it a new handler (see
>> below). It would be more flexible if I could provide a handle in
>> constructor - but how to do this when it requires the object itself.
>> Would I use a super for this sort of thing? Many thanks
> when __init__ is called the object already exists.
>> class Factory:
>> def __init__(self):
>> self.some_handler = Handler(self)
>> f = Factory()
>> f.some_handler = AnotherHandler(f)
> try this, should works:
> class Factory:
> def __init__(self):
> self._some_handler = AnotherHandler(self)
> maybe a class hierarchy is good for you
More information about the Python-list