lighter weight options to Python's logging package?
trentm at ActiveState.com
Sat Mar 11 00:07:17 CET 2006
[skip at pobox.com wrote]
> We use the standard logging package and frequently bump into performance
> issues with it (we log a lot of information). When that happens, we then go
> through our code and dump a bunch of logging calls we think we can live
> without. This invariably causes problems because we get overzealous and
> delete something we needed and are then unable to do some bit of post-mortem
> debugging until we add back in the missing logging and cut another release.
> Before I consider writing something from scratch, is there something lighter
> weight "floating around" out there already?
Do you have any profile information for where in the logging package the
time is being spent? I don't know how much of a perf issue it is for
you. Perhaps tweaking your usage of the logging package (perhaps using
custom Loggers, Filters, outputters, etc.) could be made "good enough".
TrentM at ActiveState.com
More information about the Python-list