A better RE?
eddie at holyrood.ed.ac.uk
Fri Mar 10 14:43:14 CET 2006
"Jim" <jhefferon at smcvt.edu> writes:
>Eddie Corns wrote:
>> Just a small point - what does "in order" mean here? if it means that eg 1362
>> is not valid then you're stuck because it's context sensitive and hence not
>I'm not seeing that. Any finite language is regular -- as a last
>resort you could list all ascending sequences of 7 or fewer digits (but
>perhaps I misunderstood the original poster's requirements).
No, that's what I did. Just carelessnes on my part, time I had a holiday!
More information about the Python-list