Very, Very Green Python User

[hanumizzle at gmail.com]

Scott David Daniels wrote:
> hanumizzle at gmail.com wrote:
> > Scott David Daniels wrote:
> >> hanumizzle at gmail.com wrote:
> >>> ... Is the Python debugger fairly stable?
> >> Yes, but it is not massively featured.  The "Pythonic" way is to
> >> rarely use a debugger (test first and straightforward code should
> >> lead to "shallow" bugs).  Often for most of us judiciously placed
> >> print statements suffice.
> >>
> >>  > The one you get with Perl stinks on ice. More than
> >>> anything else, I would like to have a powerful OO environment where I
> >>> do not have to worry about the debugger sucking ....
> >> Do watch your language on this newsgroup.  Lots of people read this
> >> group and there is no good reason to offend them.  In turn, you will be
> >> cut some slack.
> >
> > As one who avidly studies language, I have observed that the meaning of
> > a word slip out of its original context through idiomatic usage. If I
> > had included the implicit object of 'sucks',
>
> In fact I elided the "ass" from your original "sucks ass" in my original
>   quote, and now you carefully forget it in order to bolster your case.

D'oh! You are right.

That's why I always liked BB Forums. You get to pull Big Brother
'rectifications'.