Is there no end to Python?

[sjmsoft at gmail.com]

John Salerno wrote:
> But isn't Python sort of known for the opposite, i.e. 'one simple way',
> or something to that effect?

The Python language is clear and concise and so I don't think takes
long to learn.  But there's so many libraries and packages available
that I'll probably never use more than a fraction of them.  This is
good thing because I can ignore what I don't need.

-- Steve J. Martin