Software Needs Philosophers
peace.is.our.profession at gmx.de
Mon May 22 04:01:54 EDT 2006
after all, somebody dumped some
backup of his brain to use-net:
> Software Needs Philosophers
> by Steve Yegge, 2006-04-15.
including lots of personal details.
So what I basically took from it
is written in this paragraph:
> I was born and raised a Roman Catholic, and I renounced it when I was
> thirteen years old, after my Uncle Frank (a devout terrorist Catholic
> if there ever was one) told me to stop reading the Bible, that it would
> “really screw a person up” to do that, that you needed someone to
> interpret it for you. That wasn't the only reason I renounced it, but
> it'll suffice for our purposes.
Under 'best effort interpretation', one could see
the whole thing in the light of the small thing:
he's rescuing 'us' by telling us:
- to think rational,
- to de-construct our beliefs and
- don't put that much personal sympathy into
'subculture group pseudoreligion',
the latter is what he thinks 'computer language culture'
really is today.
I can't see what's wrong with these hypotheses
(besides he got some terms wrong); he describes
things we most probably are already aware of
(in our own context of notions) - but wouldn't
bother to fill the communication lines of the
world with it (wouldn't give a damn about ...)
f'up ==> c.l.p.m
More information about the Python-list