any plans to make pprint() a builtin?
duncan.booth at invalid.invalid
Sun May 14 15:22:52 CEST 2006
John Salerno wrote:
> Just wondering if this will ever happen, maybe in 3.0 when print becomes
> a function too? It would be a nice option to have it available without
> importing it every time, but maybe making it a builtin violates some
> kind of pythonic ideal?
There are so many things which *could* be builtins, and it really is better
not to pollute the global namespace with more than absolutely necessary.
Personally I'd just like to see 'python' a builtin shorthand for importing
a name you aren't going to use much
More information about the Python-list