any plans to make pprint() a builtin?

Edward Elliott nobody at 127.0.0.1
Wed May 17 03:47:02 CEST 2006


Ant wrote:

> Longer, messy, and what's the actual point? Wouldn't:
> 
> import pprint as pp
> pp.pprint(x)
> 
> be better, standard *and* shorter?

why not just:

from pprint import pprint
pprint (x)

No need to modify the interpreter when you can pollute the global namespace
yourself just as easily.

-- 
Edward Elliott
UC Berkeley School of Law (Boalt Hall)
complangpython at eddeye dot net



More information about the Python-list mailing list