A critic of Guido's blog on Python's lambda

Patrick May pjm at spe.com
Sun May 7 11:59:04 CEST 2006


aleaxit at yahoo.com (Alex Martelli) writes:
> In my opinion (and that of several others), the best way for Python to
> grow in this regard would be to _lose_ lambda altogether, since named
> functions are preferable

     Why?  I find the ability to create unnamed functions on the fly
to be a significant benefit when coding in Common Lisp.

Regards,

Patrick

------------------------------------------------------------------------
S P Engineering, Inc.    | The experts in large scale distributed OO
                         | systems design and implementation.
          pjm at spe.com    | (C++, Java, Common Lisp, Jini, CORBA, UML)



More information about the Python-list mailing list