Py3K idea: why not drop the colon?
mike at hobbshouse.org
Fri Nov 10 20:33:42 CET 2006
Ron Adam wrote:
> The faq also pointed out a technical reason for requiring the colon. It makes
> the underlying parser much easier to write and maintain. This shouldn't be
> taken to lightly in my opinion, because a simpler easer to maintain and more
> reliable python parser means development time can be spent improving the
> language in other areas instead of fixing parsing problems every time a new
> feature is added that might be used in a conditional expression.
Not to be too picky about it, but the FAQ was referring to editor
parsers, not the parser used by Python itself. The Python parser could
easily change its grammar to make the colon optional.
I find the editor parsing excuse to be weak since most editors tend to
get hung up on Python code anyway, regardless of the colons. (Except for
the ones that are specifically written to support Python, or are
insanely programmable, like emacs.) In fact, I find that my editor
usually gets confused when it comes across colons in dictionary literals
or lambda expressions. If it just stuck to looking at the indentation,
instead of trying to play off syntax tricks, it would behave much better.
More information about the Python-list