__init__ style questions

Duncan Booth duncan.booth at invalid.invalid
Mon Oct 2 13:33:50 CEST 2006


"Fredrik Lundh" <fredrik at pythonware.com> wrote:

> Duncan Booth wrote:
> 
>> No it isn't Pythonic.
> 
> rubbish.  using a single constructor that handles two common use cases is
> perfectly Pythonic (especially if you're targeting casual programmers).
> 
Yes, but I don't think that the specific case the OP asked about would be 
pythonic: there was no need two separate calling conventions there.



More information about the Python-list mailing list