__init__ style questions
duncan.booth at invalid.invalid
Mon Oct 2 13:33:50 CEST 2006
"Fredrik Lundh" <fredrik at pythonware.com> wrote:
> Duncan Booth wrote:
>> No it isn't Pythonic.
> rubbish. using a single constructor that handles two common use cases is
> perfectly Pythonic (especially if you're targeting casual programmers).
Yes, but I don't think that the specific case the OP asked about would be
pythonic: there was no need two separate calling conventions there.
More information about the Python-list