Python component model

[Steve Holden]

Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> "Edward Diener No Spam" wrote:
> 
> 
>>>if you want better support for more precise hooking, post some examples.
>>
>>I want a design-time environment to hook up my objects in a visual way.
>>I think it is easier than doing it manually, even in Python.
> 
> 
> what objects?  what hooks?  visually, in what way?
> 
> 
>>>>All you are saying is that you don't have a need for this, but perhaps others do.
>>>
>>>handwavy references to what "other may need" is another thing you should
>>>avoid if you want your Python change proposal to be successful.
>>
>>I did not say what "others may need".
> 
> 
> I'm not sure I see the big difference between "perhaps others do [have a need]"
> and "others may need", but that's me.
> 
He's wriggling anyway, as his opening post said (among other things) "I 
believe that Python should have a common components model for all RAD
development environments ...". So unless he's the only person who's 
going to use these development environments it does indeed sound a 
little prescriptive.

regards
  Steve
-- 
Steve Holden       +44 150 684 7255  +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC/Ltd          http://www.holdenweb.com
Skype: holdenweb       http://holdenweb.blogspot.com
Recent Ramblings     http://del.icio.us/steve.holden