Names changed to protect the guilty
steve at REMOVE.THIS.cybersource.com.au
Sat Oct 7 13:58:31 CEST 2006
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 18:29:34 -0700, John Machin wrote:
> MonkeeSage wrote:
>> On Oct 6, 8:02 pm, "MonkeeSage" <MonkeeS... at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > it is clearer to you to make the condition explicit ("blah not False"),
>> "blah not False" -> "blah is False"
> Whichever way your team wants to interpret it, d00d.
> Please consider whether you should be writing "(blah is False) is
> True", that would be more explicit.
Puh-lease! Get it right!
It should be "((blah is False) is True) is True".
More information about the Python-list