Surprise using the 'is' operator
toby at tobiah.org
Wed Sep 27 18:24:40 CEST 2006
>> Suppose I fill an list with 100 million random integers in the range
>> of 1 - 65535. Wouldn't I save much memory if all of the ocurrances
>> of '12345' pointed to the same integer object? Why should more be made,
>> when they all do the same thing, and are not subject to change?
> Because for typical usage of integers (which doesn't include your example),
> it is more expensive to check if there's already an integer with that
> value out there than to create a new one.
I see. I assume then, that the lookup performance hit is acceptable
as a trade off against memory usage for the quite commonly used range
of (-5, 257). Is that the idea?
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
More information about the Python-list