chris.cavalaria at free.fr
Thu Apr 12 10:29:33 CEST 2007
Carl Banks a écrit :
> On Apr 11, 3:10 pm, "7stud" <bbxx789_0... at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Apr 11, 10:44 am, "Scott" <s_brosci... at comcast.net> wrote:
>>> As said before I'm new to programming, and I need in depth explaination to
>>> understand everything the way I want to know it, call it a personality quirk
>>> With pop() you remove the last element of a list and return its value:
>>> Now I know list is a bad name, but for the sake of arguement lets assume its
>>> not a built in sequence>
>>>>>> list = ['this', 'is', 'an', 'example']
>>> ['this', 'is', 'an']
>>> I understand all that. What I don't understand is why all the documentation
>>> I see says, "When removing a specific element from a list using pop() it
>>> must be in this format: list.pop([i]).
>>> At first I took that to mean that list.pop(i) would return some type of
>>> error, but it doesn't.
>> It's understandable that the definition of pop() is confusing in that
>> way. It looks like the argument should be a list. As others have
>> said, that is not what the brackets mean when the documents show the
>> formal definition of a function.
> I wonder if the documentation could take advantage of Python 3000
> annotation syntax. So
> would be replaced in the docs by
> pop(x: OPTIONAL)
> Just a thought, probably not a good one. The brackets are so
> pervasive that it's probably better to just let newbies be confused
> for a little bit.
I'd rather go for the overloading syntax. ie:
Remove the item at the given position in the list, and return it. If no
index is specified, a.pop() removes and returns the last item in the list.
More information about the Python-list