Why NOT only one class per file?
steve at holdenweb.com
Thu Apr 5 13:00:35 CEST 2007
> Chris Lasher a écrit :
>> A friend of mine with a programming background in Java and Perl places
>> each class in its own separate file in . I informed him that keeping
>> all related classes together in a single file is more in the Python
>> idiom than one file per class. He asked why, and frankly, his valid
>> question has me flummoxed.
> In Java, you HAVE to place a class in it's own file. That's how the
> language works. But in Java, you do not have to place each class in it's
> own module/package, in fact, it would be bad.
> It's the same in Python: you do not want to have one class per
> Unfortunately, in Python, a module/package is a file, and in Java, it's
> a directory. Also, Python doesn't really have the notion of a "root
> Translation: "import foo; foo.foo()" sucks so avoid having only one
> class per module :)
One further thought:
Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC/Ltd http://www.holdenweb.com
Skype: holdenweb http://del.icio.us/steve.holden
Recent Ramblings http://holdenweb.blogspot.com
More information about the Python-list