Misleading wikipedia article on Python 3?

"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Mon Aug 6 07:44:39 CEST 2007


John J. Lee schrieb:
> "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> writes:
> [... snip stuff I don't follow ...]
>> However, it *is* a design goal to make 2.6 so that transition to
>> 3k becomes simpler. That's not a 3k feature, but a 2.6 one.
> 
> Not sure I care about this sort of thing for the purpses of my
> question.  I just wanted to know: is it easy to make my code so it
> runs on 2.6 and 3.0, without funny stuff like a code translator?
> Seems wikipedia said "yes" and Guido said "no".

Neither of these are qualified to make any statements about your
code. Only you can find out yourself. OTOH, neither of these *did*
make any statement about *your* code.

Regards,
Martin



More information about the Python-list mailing list