status of Programming by Contract (PEP 316)?
michele.simionato at gmail.com
Fri Aug 31 11:31:05 CEST 2007
On Aug 31, 10:02 am, Russ <uymqlp... at sneakemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Alex. I've always enjoyed your Piggies talks at
> Google (although I missed he last one because I was out
> of town). I'm disappointed to see that you seem to have
> taken personal offense from remarks I made to someone else who
> attacked me first.
I am curious. Why do you think I attacked you? The conversion went as
> On Aug 29, 7:21 am, Russ <uymqlp... at sneakemail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for that information. That's too bad, because it seems like a
>> strong positive capability to add to Python. I wonder why the cold
>> reception. Were there problems with the idea itself or just the
>> implementation? Or is it just a low priority?
> Why do you think that would ad a strong positive capability?
> To me at least it seems a big fat lot of over-engineering, not
> needed in 99% of programs. In the remaining 1%, it would still not
> be needed since Python provides out of the box very powerful
> metaprogramming capabilities so that you can implement
> yourself the checks you need, if you really need them.
Basically you said "I think DbC is good" and I said "I don't think
I would not call that an attack. If you want to see an attack, wait
Alex replying to you observations about the low quality of code at
More information about the Python-list