Important Research Project
Tim Couper
tim.couper at scivisum.co.uk
Thu Aug 30 10:44:50 EDT 2007
Paul
Excellent post .. brightens up the otherwise hum-drum life!
Tim
Dr Tim Couper
CTO, SciVisum Ltd
www.scivisum.com
Paul McGuire wrote:
> On Aug 30, 8:12 am, "E.D.G." <edgrs... at ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>> Important Research Project (Related to computer programming)
>>
>> Posted by E.D.G. on August 30, 2007 edgrs... at ix.netcom.com
>>
>> This report is being posted to a number of Internet Newsgroups
>>
>
> Always the hallmark of a considerate poster.
>
>
>> to see if
>> there are any experienced computer programmers who would like to provide
>> some assistance with an effort to develop a Perl language computer program.
>>
>> Interested parties can try contacting me by e-mail or by posting a
>> response note to the comp.lang.perl.misc newsgroup. They would need to
>> download a recent (free) MSI copy of Perl from the ActiveState Web site and
>> get it running on a Windows XP or Vista system.
>>
>> http://www.activestate.com
>>
>>
>
> This is a little backwards, one usually presents their research topic
> *first* and their contact info *last*. The reason? SO PEOPLE KNOW
> WHAT THE @#$(&#!@ YOU ARE WORKING ON! Ok, I'll bite, keep reading...
>
>
>> I am presently using Perl 5.8.8
>>
>
> Whoop-de-doo for you.
>
>
>> but plan to upgrade to the latest
>> version as soon as possible. People can use Windows 98 if that is the only
>> operating system available. Perl also runs on other operating systems. But
>> at this time I specifically need help with the Windows version.
>>
>>
>
> I suspect Perl is largely the same Perl on all those platforms. Win
> 98? Is this a zombie spam from the turn of the century?
>
>
>> The goal is to have a single Perl program (or modules) perform functions
>> that have been done by a sizeable collection of other language programs in
>> the past.
>>
>>
>
> Doing what!? Grrr..., keep reading, there's gotta be a punch line...
>
>
>> Help is presently needed with learning how to get Perl to generate
>> charts and also produce standalone .exe copies of itself. The plan is to
>> then make those .exe copies available to other scientific researchers around
>> the world for free use along with free use updates when they become
>> available. If other researchers wish to get Perl running on their own
>> computers then they will probably also be given the source code for the
>> original program for free use so that they can do their own development
>> work.
>>
>>
>
> Ohmigod, is Google broken? Or has Perl gone this long and this far
> without support for creating charts and graphs? Sounds like about 10
> minutes of research.
>
>
>> Perl was originally chosen because it is quite versatile, is a free
>> download, and is supported both by ActiveState and quite a few independent
>> programmers. So other researchers could get their own versions running
>> without having to worry about viruses or cost.
>>
>>
>
> (Why is this posted on all these non-Perl newsgroups, then? I've
> *seen* Perl already, and never want to again!)
>
>
>> So far the work is fairly advanced. The effort has been underway for at
>> least a decade.
>>
>
> ... and we are just getting around to plotting some data.
>
>
>> The core data generation program was formally copyrighted
>> several years ago.
>>
>
> Red flag #37 - "formally copyrighted", wooo-ooooh
>
>
>> My present version of Perl will send data to Windows as
>> if it were being manually typed into the keyboard (important for controlling
>> other programs). And it can directed to respond to most keystrokes even
>> when another program is the active one. Unfortunately, Windows also
>> presently responds to those keystrokes. And that complicates things a bit.
>>
>>
>
> ... and has for the past decade, and I still haven't figured it out.
>
>
>> Not being a professional computer programmer I have been finding it
>> difficult to get new features such as a chart generating ability merged with
>> and running with Perl. And the entire research project is now being slowed
>> as a result. One of my colleagues has done an extensive amount of work with
>> Basic. And I even offered to pay him to help with the Perl development
>> effort. But after he downloaded a copy of Perl and examined it he decided
>> that this would involve too much effort. I have to agree with him.
>>
>>
>
> Maybe that up-front language choice could stand a review...
>
>
>> Once it is possible to create charts and .exe versions the plan is for
>> researchers around the world to develop Perl modules for generating a
>> variety of data related to sun, moon, planet, ocean tide crest and trough,
>> and Solid Earth Tide locations. Most of those data can already be generated
>> with other programs. Some of the data are not yet available anywhere as far
>> as I am aware. If the effort is unusually successful the Perl program (or
>> modules) might eventually be converted to CGI programs that will run at one
>> or more Internet Web sites.
>>
>
> AHHH! The "research", I almost forgot! Why is it left to the end of
> the message? And do we still know what the @#(*&$ this "variety of
> data" is for? I'm going to take a wild guess here - earthquake
> prediction? perpetual motion? picking guaranteed-to-win lottery
> numbers?
>
> After a pitch like that, who could not be tempted at the prospect of
> "generating a variety of data related to sun, moon, etc. etc."? Sign
> me up - NOT!
>
> GTFA,
> -- Paul
>
>
More information about the Python-list
mailing list