Efficient Rank Ordering of Nested Lists
pablo.mitchell at gmail.com
pablo.mitchell at gmail.com
Sat Aug 4 14:09:34 EDT 2007
On Aug 3, 5:53 am, Neil Cerutti <horp... at yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 2007-08-03, pablo.mitch... at gmail.com <pablo.mitch... at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > A naive approach to rank ordering (handling ties as well) of nested
> > lists may be accomplished via:
>
> > def rankLists(nestedList):
> > def rankList(singleList):
> > sortedList = list(singleList)
> > sortedList.sort()
> > return map(sortedList.index, singleList)
> > return map(rankList, nestedList)
>
> > >>> unranked = [ [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ], [ 3, 1, 5, 2, 4 ], [ -1.1, 2.2,
> > 0, -1.1, 13 ] ]
> > >>> print rankLists(unranked)
>
> > [[0, 1, 2, 3, 4], [2, 0, 4, 1, 3], [0, 3, 2, 0, 4]]
>
> > This works nicely when the dimensions of the nested list are
> > small. It is slow when they are big. Can someone suggest a
> > clever way to speed it up?
>
> Use binary search instead of linear.
>
> import bisect
> import functools
>
> def rankLists(nestedList):
> def rankList(singleList):
> sortedList = list(sorted(singleList))
> return map(functools.partial(bisect.bisect_left, sortedList), singleList)
> return map(rankList, nestedList)
>
> --
> Neil Cerutti
> Facts are stupid things. --Ronald Reagan
Very clean and precisely what I was looking for. Thanks for expanding
my knowledge of the language.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list