list index()

zzbbaadd at aol.com zzbbaadd at aol.com
Thu Aug 30 20:45:25 CEST 2007


> That wish will only come true if you maintain your own fork of Python 3.
> has_key() will go away, period. It has been made obsolete by "in", which
> is faster and more concise.

Is there really some reason  "key" IN dict can be implemented faster
than dict.has_key("key")???






More information about the Python-list mailing list