carsten at uniqsys.com
Thu Aug 30 21:08:08 CEST 2007
On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 11:45 -0700, zzbbaadd at aol.com wrote:
> > That wish will only come true if you maintain your own fork of Python 3.
> > has_key() will go away, period. It has been made obsolete by "in", which
> > is faster and more concise.
> Is there really some reason "key" IN dict can be implemented faster
> than dict.has_key("key")???
Yes, see e.g.
More information about the Python-list