Efficient Rank Ordering of Nested Lists
pyscottishguy at hotmail.com
pyscottishguy at hotmail.com
Fri Aug 3 12:20:10 EDT 2007
On Aug 2, 10:20 pm, "pablo.mitch... at gmail.com"
<pablo.mitch... at gmail.com> wrote:
> A naive approach to rank ordering (handling ties as well) of nested
> lists may be accomplished via:
>
> def rankLists(nestedList):
> def rankList(singleList):
> sortedList = list(singleList)
> sortedList.sort()
> return map(sortedList.index, singleList)
> return map(rankList, nestedList)
>
> >>> unranked = [ [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ], [ 3, 1, 5, 2, 4 ], [ -1.1, 2.2,
> 0, -1.1, 13 ] ]
> >>> print rankLists(unranked)
>
> [[0, 1, 2, 3, 4], [2, 0, 4, 1, 3], [0, 3, 2, 0, 4]]
>
> This works nicely when the dimensions of the nested list are small.
> It is slow when they are big. Can someone suggest a clever way to
> speed it up?
Isn't there something wrong with the ordering?
Pablo's answers are:
[ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ] == [0, 1, 2, 3, 4] correct
[ 3, 1, 5, 2, 4 ] == [2, 0, 4, 1, 3] wrong?
[ -1.1, 2.2, 0, -1.1, 13 ] == [0, 3, 2, 0, 4] wrong?
Doing it in my head I get:
[ 3, 1, 5, 2, 4 ] == [ 1, 3, 0, 4, 2 ]
[ -1.1, 2.2, 0, -1.1, 13 ] == [0, 3, 2, 1, 4]
What gives?
Did I misunderstand what "rank ordering (handling ties as well)" means?
More information about the Python-list
mailing list