Pep 3105: the end of print?

["Martin v. Löwis"]

Neil Cerutti schrieb:
> On 2007-02-23, I V <wrongbad at gmail.com> wrote:
>> While that's true, C++ compiler vendors, for example, take
>> backwards compatibility significantly less seriously, it seems
>> to me. 
> 
> Compiler vendors usually take care of their customers with
> compiler switches that enable backwards compatibility.

That's a bold statement, after I V already gave two examples
(g++ and MSVC 2005) of compilers that broke backwards compatibility
without providing compiler switches to bring it back. These two
aren't "minor" compilers.

Regards,
Martin