2.3-2.5 what improved?
no-spam at no-spam-no-spam.invalid
Wed Jan 17 12:20:53 CET 2007
Robin Becker wrote:
> A large cgi based web Python-2.3 application needs to be speed improved.
> experiments show the following under reasonable testing (these are 2
> second reportlab pdf productions)
> 1) 2.3 --> 2.5 improvement small 1-2%
> 2) cgi --> fcgi improvement medium 10-12%
> I sort of remember claims being made about 2.5 being 10% faster than
> 2.4/2.3 etc etc. Can anyone say where the speedups were? Presumably we
> have a lot of old cruft that could be improved in some way eg moving
> loops into comprehensions, using iterator methods etc. Are those sort of
> things what we should look at?
Python 2.5 became quite fat. For bare CGI the Python load/init
time eats all improvements. Smaller scripts even loose lot of speed.
I still like Python 2.3 for many other reasons for many
applications - especially for CGI's, on Windows, for deployable
apps, GUI's etc. because the fat coming with Python 2.4 is not
balanced by necessary goods - mostly just fancy things.
( I run even a list of patches and module copies/addaptations down
to 2.3 because of that :-) )
Real news come with Py3K
More information about the Python-list