OT Annoying Habits (Was: when format strings attack)
gagsl-py at yahoo.com.ar
Sat Jan 20 02:15:22 CET 2007
At Friday 19/1/2007 18:43, Carroll, Barry wrote:
>Secondly, can someone point me to the Standard Usenet Convention that
>mandates against top-posting. This is not sarcasm; I would really like
>to see it.
There are some guidelines, like RFC 1855 (not a real standard, or
enforced in any way):
"If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you
summarize the original AT THE TOP OF THE MESSAGE, or include just
enough text of the original to give a context (...) But do not
include the entire original!" (capitals added by me).
>You see, I recently returned to Usenet after a LONG absence.
>When I was last a regular Usenet citizen the Internet was new, GUI
>interfaces were experimental and the World Wide Web didn't exist yet.
>Newsreader software was text-based. Top-posting was the common
>practice, because it was the most convenient: you didn't have to page
>through an arbitrarily large number of messages, most of which you'd
>already read umpteen times, to get to the new stuff you were interested
Really? Top posting a common practice? I'm not a youngster either and
I've never seen top posting as a *norm* but an exception.
Old newsreaders had a new/quoted ratio, and enforced it to be rather
high - so it was not easy to forget to trim the quoted text.
Digging a bit one can find some old recommendations, like the Big
Dummy's Guide to the Internet (1993):
Or people puzzled on how this works:
Preguntá. Respondé. Descubrí.
Todo lo que querías saber, y lo que ni imaginabas,
está en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta).
More information about the Python-list