Threaded for loop

[Paul Rubin]

"John" <weekender_ny at yahoo.com> writes:
> Damn! That is bad news. So even if caclulate is independent for
> (i,j) and is computable on separate CPUs (parts of it are CPU bound,
> parts are IO bound) python cant take advantage of this?

Not at the moment, unless you write C extensions that release the
global interpreter lock (GIL).  One of these days.  Meanwhile there
are various extension modules that let you use multiple processes,
look up POSH and Pyro.