Portable general timestamp format, not 2038-limited
martin at see.sig.for.address
Wed Jul 11 00:49:59 CEST 2007
Ilya Zakharevich wrote:
> [A complimentary Cc of this posting was sent to
> <greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz>], who wrote in article <5fh0imF3cjte7U1 at mid.individual.net>:
>> Ilya Zakharevich wrote:
>>> In pedantic mode: negative timestamps make sense with Big Bang as the
>>> epoch as well. (AFAIU, the current way of thinking is that it was
>>> "just too hot" before the big bang, it is not that "there was
>> If Stephen Hawking is right, the shape of the universe
>> is such that there isn't any time "before" the big bang
>> at all. It's like asking what's north of the North Pole.
> I do not remember any statement like this - even from 70s... Could
> you provide a reference? There were conjectures about "initial
> singularity", but I do not recollect them related to SH.
Its in "A Short History of Time". Sorry I can't quote chapter or page,
but a friend borrowed my copy and lent me Dawkins "Climbing Mount
Improbable" before vanishing, never to be seen since. Not an equal
exchange: I preferred ASHOT to CMI.
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
More information about the Python-list