Where is the syntax for the dict() constructor ?!

[Nis Jørgensen]

Neil Cerutti skrev:

> Mostly you can use the default 'excel' dialect and be quite
> happy, since Excel is the main reason anybody still cares about
> this unecessarily hard to parse (it requires more than one
> character of lookahead for no reason except bad design) data
> format.

I knew there had to be a reason why everyone is using xml these days ...

Nis