Python's "only one way to do it" philosophy isn't good?

Lenard Lindstrom len-l at
Tue Jul 3 07:39:15 CEST 2007

Douglas Alan wrote:
> Lenard Lindstrom <len-l at> writes:
>> But some things will make it into ISO Python.
> Is there a movement afoot of which I'm unaware to make an ISO standard
> for Python?

Not that I know of. But it would seem any language that lasts long 
enough will become ISO standard. I just meant that even though Python 
has no formal standard there are documented promises that will not be 
broken lightly by any implementation.

Lenard Lindstrom
<len-l at>

More information about the Python-list mailing list