Python's "only one way to do it" philosophy isn't good?
len-l at telus.net
Tue Jul 3 07:39:15 CEST 2007
Douglas Alan wrote:
> Lenard Lindstrom <len-l at telus.net> writes:
>> But some things will make it into ISO Python.
> Is there a movement afoot of which I'm unaware to make an ISO standard
> for Python?
Not that I know of. But it would seem any language that lasts long
enough will become ISO standard. I just meant that even though Python
has no formal standard there are documented promises that will not be
broken lightly by any implementation.
<len-l at telus.net>
More information about the Python-list