Python's "only one way to do it" philosophy isn't good?

Steven D'Aprano steve at REMOVE.THIS.cybersource.com.au
Sat Jun 16 03:25:55 CEST 2007


On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:05:27 -0400, Douglas Alan wrote:

> You are ignoring the fact that Scheme has a powerful syntax extension
> mechanism (i.e., hygenic macros), which means that anyone in the world
> can basically extend Scheme to include practically any language
> feature they might like it to have.


You say that like it is a good thing.


-- 
Steven.




More information about the Python-list mailing list