high performance/threaded applications in Python - your experiences?

Ivan Voras ivoras at __fer.hr__
Sat Jun 23 16:43:39 CEST 2007


Jay Loden wrote:

> I was hoping for some experiences that some of you on the list may have had in dealing with Python in a high performance and/or threaded environment. In essence, I'm wondering how big of a deal the GIL can be in a  real-world scenario where you need to take advantage of multiple processor machines, thread pools, etc. How much does it get in the way (or not), and how difficult have you found it to architect applications for high performance? I have read a number of articles and opinions on whether or not the GIL is a good thing, and how it affects threaded performance on multiple processor machines, but what I haven't seen is experiences of people who have actually done it and reported back "it was a nightmare" or "it's no big deal" ;)

The theory: If your threads mostly do IO, you can get decent CPU usage
even with Python. If the threads are CPU-bound (e.g. you do a lot of
computational work), you'll effectively only make use of one processor.

In practice, I've noticed that Python applications don't scale very much
across CPUs even if they're doing mostly IO. I blame cache trashing or
similar effect caused by too many global synchronization events. I
didn't measure but the speedup may even be negative with large-ish
number of CPUs (>=4).

OTOH, if you can get by with using forking instead of threads (given
enough effort) you can achieve very good scaling.

-- 
(\__/)
(O.o)
(> < )

This is Bunny.
Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination!

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 258 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/attachments/20070623/3a991114/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Python-list mailing list