Warren Stringer warren at muse.com
Fri Jun 1 03:42:05 CEST 2007

> >         I did not hijack another thread
> You really did.  In the first message you sent, we see the following
> header:
> > In-Reply-To: <1180504773.374529.161740 at q66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>

Damn! I suck. Outlook as a newsreader sucks. I need to use something else.

> I retyped the code you posted in the first post, and did not get the
> same results as you.  Specifically:
> >>> def a: print 'a'
> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
> >>> def b: print 'b'
> SyntaxError: invalid syntax

> those obviously were not copied from working code.
> >>> c[:]()
> TypeError: 'tuple' object is not callable
> this has the correct spelling of 'tuple' in it.  Your post misspelled it.
> and finally,
> >>> c[0]()
> a
> >>> c[:][0]
> <function a at 0x00CBB130>
> I don't know how you could have gotten c[:][0] to print 'a', but it
> wasn't by running all of the code you presented to us.
> --
> Jerry

They were copied from working code. Copied *badly*? Yes. Running python via:
   Windows -> start -> run -> python 
doesn't allow cut and paste 

Here is what I tested, now cut and past from visual studio IDE 

def a(): print 'a'
def b(): print 'b'
c = (a,b) 
c[:]()  # typeError 
c[0]()  # expected
c[:][0]() # huh?
[i() for i in c] # too long and ...huh?

Now, I'm extremely annoyed at my own original post, for misleading typos.

Yeah, Mikael's example is really cool! And I followed his suggestion of
making it cellphone friendly by shorting the name, like so:

class do(list):
    def __call__(self,*args,**kwargs):
        return [f(*args,**kwargs) for f in self]

def a(): print 'a called'
def b(): print 'b called'
c = do()
c = [a,b]

I prefer that last line, because [:] is very expensive to type from a cell

In summary:
	Sorry about the hijacked thread
	Sorry about the typos
	Outlook is an odd newsreader
	Mikael's solution works
	No PEP needed for this example

Now, if I could only could do this:




More information about the Python-list mailing list