possible to preserve subprocess.Popen objects for later?
rjagodic at gmail.com
Fri Jun 22 22:42:59 CEST 2007
> Sounds like you might want to consider running the backround task as
> either a service or daemon and communicate via a TCP/IP connection or
> a named pipe rather than using STDIN/OUT. Actually you could use
> either idea without actually setting up a daemon.
Unfortunately I don't have control over the processes that I am
running (they are components of a much larger system that I am trying
to bring under one roof).
However, it seems that a named pipe might work. Is it possible to set
up a named pipe for a process that I start and tell that process to
direct all its output to it?
More information about the Python-list