__peter__ at web.de
Fri Jun 1 12:14:02 CEST 2007
Sergey Dorofeev wrote:
> "Peter Otten" <__peter__ at web.de> wrote in message
> news:f3oo0p$c7c$03$1 at news.t-online.com...
>>>>> Please help, is there way to use sub-expressions in lambda?
>>>>> For example, if I want to calculate sin(x^2)+cos(x^2) I must code:
>>>>> lambda x: sin(x*x)+cos(x*x)
>>>>> How to make x*x to be evaluated once?
>>>>>>> (lambda x: [sin(x2) + cos(x2) for x2 in [x*x]])(.5) == sin(.5*.5)
>>>> The real answer is of course: Use a function.
>>> But what about something like
>>> lambda x: sin(y)+cos(y) where y=x*x
>>> May be this could be a PEP? If there is no straight way to do this.
>> def f(x):
>> y = x*x
>> return sin(y) + cos(y)
>> What is not straightforward about that?
> This code is needed once in a map,
Perhaps you like [sin(y)+cos(y) for y in (x*x for x in items)] then.
> so I don't want 3+ extra lines.
What syntax would you suggest for a lambda enhanced to cover your use case?
I suppose you will end up with roughly the same number of characters, all
crammed in one line -- or broken into lines at a random position as it
happens with overambitious list comprehensions.
> Solution seemed so simple...
It /is/ simple.
> I always considered python as languague, where simple things do not
> require extensive coding.
In Python, when conciseness and readability compete, readability tends to
win (with the inline if...else as a notable exception).
> Moreover, this construction is common thing in functional programming.
I can write Haskell in any language :-)
More information about the Python-list