looking for a fastest parallel approach for quick executing of lotssmall routines

Terry Reedy tjreedy at udel.edu
Mon Mar 19 16:36:40 EDT 2007


"dmitrey" <openopt at ukr.net> wrote in message 
news:1174335235.682491.300930 at l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
| hi all,
| I'm looking for a way to execute a number (from 2 to thouzands,
| usually small) of python functions as quikly as it's possible.
|
| There seems to be lots of solutions, for example mentioned at
| http://www.cimec.org.ar/python/ , but first of all it would be very
| nice if the module is included into the scipy module or Python core,
| for to minimize additional software dependences.
| So what is the best choise? And if noone is included in Python
| standard distribution - why it is so and is anything intended in
| future Python versions: 2.6 or later?

Not many of use have Beowolf clusters, and the stuff there is experimental. 






More information about the Python-list mailing list