BUSTED!!! 100% VIDEO EVIDENCE that WTC7 was controlled demolition!! NEW FOOTAGE!!! Ask yourself WHY havn't I seen this footage before?

quasi quasi at null.set
Mon May 7 23:53:44 EDT 2007


On Mon, 7 May 2007 17:00:01 -0400, krw <krw at att.bizzzz> wrote:

>In article <j15v33h378a79fvqa3j03td6oaqabs8s2a at 4ax.com>, 
>quasi at null.set says...
>> On Mon, 7 May 2007 10:55:55 -0400, James Beck
>> <jim at reallykillersystems.com> wrote:
>> 
>> >In article <0k8p33h90bp5tfajedb4bmd2eik8gfi2ho at 4ax.com>, quasi at null.set 
>> >says...
>> >> On Sat, 05 May 2007 07:54:50 +0100, Eeyore
>> >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >quasi wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Gib Bogle wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Ah, so the firefighters were in on the conspiracy!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> No, but the firefighters are very much aware that there is more to
>> >> >> 9/11 than has been officially revealed.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This is even more true at Pentagon. The firefighters there brought
>> >> >> dogs trained to search for survivors and/or remains
>> >> >
>> >> >Sounds like good practice.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> and found nothing.
>> >> >
>> >> >And the significance of this is ?
>> >> 
>> >> The plane was supposed to have passengers.
>> >> 
>> >> quasi
>> >> 
>> >Yep, and they found them all, therefore, there were none for the dogs to 
>> >find.  
>> 
>> You pretty much made that up.
>> 
>> They found nothing -- no bodies, no body parts, no blood, no bones, no
>> luggage, no rings (do gold rings melt at jet fuel temperatures?), no
>> jewelry (do diamonds melt at jet fuel temperatures?), no plane seats,
>> no silverware (ok, maybe they only had plastic). In other words, an
>> immediate mystery to the firefighters was the lack of any indication
>> that the plane had passengers. Even if you believe that most of the
>> passengers were essentially incinerated, it's not believable that all
>> of them were. Some of the bodies should have been recoverable right at
>> the scene.
>
>If none of the passenger's remains were ever found, why all the fuss 
>last year when they found more. 

That's news to me. We're talking about the Pentagon, not the WTC.
Besides, I didn't say that no remains were ever found. What I said was
that no passenger remains were found at the Pentagon on 9/11 by the
firefighters or their trained rescue dogs.

At the WTC, no passenger remains were ever found, as far as I know. Of
course, that's not so surprising. What is surprising is the all too
convenient find of Mohammed Atta's undamaged passport in the WTC
rubble. It wasn't even buried. It was just sitting there, waiting to
be found.

>IOW, you're a liar.

That's way too strong.

I'm not saying anything I know to be false.

>> Weeks later, parts of the wreckage were supposedly "analyzed" at a
>> government lab, and the official report claims they were able to
>> isolate DNA for many of the passengers. It doesn't ring true. 
>
>...and a fool.

See if you can keep your argument from degenerating to the level of
personal attacks.

quasi



More information about the Python-list mailing list