Is wsgi ready for prime time?

[Stargaming]

Ron Garret wrote:
> The wsgiref module in Python 2.5 seems to be empty:
> 
> [ron at mickey:~/Sites/modpy]$ python
> Python 2.5 (r25:51908, Mar  1 2007, 10:09:05) 
> [GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5367)] on darwin
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
> 
>>>>import wsgiref
>>>>dir(wsgiref)
> 
> ['__builtins__', '__doc__', '__file__', '__name__', '__path__']
> 
> 
> So... is wsgi considered ready for production use, or is it still on the 
> bleeding edge?  And if the former, which implementation should one use?
> 
> rg

 >>> help(wsgiref)
Help on package wsgiref:

NAME
     wsgiref - wsgiref -- a WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library

DESCRIPTION
     Current Contents:

     * util -- Miscellaneous useful functions and wrappers

     * headers -- Manage response headers

     * handlers -- base classes for server/gateway implementations

     * simple_server -- a simple BaseHTTPServer that supports WSGI

     * validate -- validation wrapper that sits between an app and a server
       to detect errors in either

     To-Do:

     * cgi_gateway -- Run WSGI apps under CGI (pending a deployment 
standard)

     * cgi_wrapper -- Run CGI apps under WSGI

     * router -- a simple middleware component that handles URL traversal

PACKAGE CONTENTS
     handlers
     headers
     simple_server
     util
     validate

Reading the documentation can be useful sometimes. Recommending 
http://docs.python.org/lib/module-wsgiref.html, too.