omissions in python docs?

[Terry Reedy]

"Anthony Irwin" <nospam at noemailhere.nowhere> wrote in message 
news:f2j8sr$s3h$1 at news-01.bur.connect.com.au...
| 7stud wrote:
| > On May 17, 7:23 pm, 7stud <bbxx789_0... at yahoo.com> wrote:
| >
| > By the way, have the python doc keepers ever visited the php docs?  In
| > my opinion, they are the best docs of any language I've encountered
| > because users can add posts to any page in the docs to correct them or
| > post code showing how to get around various idiosyncrasies when using
| > the functions.
| >
| I also like the php docs and love that you can type any function into
| the search at php.net and the documentation just comes up and there is
| example code and then user comments also.

Reactions to php docs are rather idiosyncratic.  I did visit in response to 
such positive recommendations and and consider them to be pretty bad, and 
posted why at the time.

tjr