Should proxy objects lie about their class name?

[John J. Lee]

jjl at pobox.com (John J. Lee) writes:

> Not much to add to the subject line.  I mean something like this:
>
> ProxyClass.__name__ = ProxiedClass.__name__
>
>
> I've been told that this is common practice.  Is it?  Would this
> surprise you if you ran into it in a debugging session?

Does nobody have an opinion on this?  Pull your socks up, c.l.py!

<insert reference to argument sketch here>


John