Should proxy objects lie about their class name?
pavlovevidence at gmail.com
Tue Nov 27 00:56:16 CET 2007
On Nov 20, 3:50 pm, j... at pobox.com (John J. Lee) wrote:
> Not much to add to the subject line. I mean something like this:
> ProxyClass.__name__ = ProxiedClass.__name__
> I've been told that this is common practice. Is it? Would this
> surprise you if you ran into it in a debugging session?
> One very real advantage that I can see is avoiding breaking existing
> Thanks in advance for your views
Python 3.0 has a proposal, accepted I believe, to allow classes to
control the behavior of issubclass and ininstance, so there appears to
be tacit support from the language for mimicking the proxied classes
in such ways.
I guess for me it would be a judgment call on based how tight I wanted
the proxy class to be--is it being the class, or is it just standing
More information about the Python-list