Closure/binding problem or misunderstanding

[Bob.Sidebotham at gmail.com]

On Nov 9, 9:54 am, Boris Borcic <bbor... at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes this is the expected behavior. Both your getpath() functions return the
> current value of the single path variable at the time of invocation. Perhaps
> this would be the slightest bit clearer if subdir.iteritems() did not provide
> your items in swapped order (so that the returned values would be "this is two").

Yes, this helps, too. It's actually quite elegantly simple (it's just
not fully obvious (from the manual) until you completely grok the way
namespaces work).

Thanks,
Bob